2006

Content

Preface Preface 7 11
The Green Fodder Hydroponic or "Green Fodder
Hydroponics": What Is It? Background
13 15 15 In the history

Worldwide
In Colombia 20 15 50 cows per hectare

20 Grasses 23
concentrated animal diets 25
Justification 31
Product Features 31
Crops without substrate 32
HGF Advantages and disadvantages Advantages
35. 35
Effect of HGF in beef cattle milk production
38 40 40

Increased fertility decline in the incidence of mastitis 40 Decrease in other food

40 40
Water Saving Efficiency in production time 41
Quality animal feed safety
41 42 43 Production costs

FVH 44
domestic fowl Diversification and intensification of activities Disadvantages

Product 44 46
Misinformation and assessment of 46
technology high installation cost 47
Methods and factors that influence the production
Hydroponic Green Forage 49
Objectives in the production of HGF 49 49 Production Methods

HGF production process seeding
50 50 Performance

51 51 Seed Selection Seed Cleaning

pregerminative 53 54
seed germination
Oreo 55 55 56

Production Irrigation Fertigation trays
57 59 58
Harvest
Examples of use of HGF in 60 feed
Facilities 65 Structures
or disused premises
65 Modern and High Technology 65 67

Our model 240 forage unit trays feed 67 to 480 Unit
67 trays of 720 forage
Unit
Unit 68 trays of 960 trays feed 68
68 Areas of Cava Production hall
Area hydration
68 68 68 pregermination
Area
ventilation and cooling system 68
grain conveying system 68
pregerminated Recycling Zone nutrition
69 69 Production Area Civil Works
70
Drainage
recirculation tank 70 71 71

Lighting Materials Equipment Shelf 72
Timer Control
74 74
thermometer maximum and minimum pH Controller
75 76 76 Conductivity

Hydrometer, including irrigation
78 78 80

CO2 Hydroponics Forage Nutrition PB 83 85 Crude protein

True protein PV Lignin

86 86 87
Nutrient Digestibility stock solution
87 88 89

The nutrient solution pH Electrical conductivity
89 90 90 chlorides

Boro Presence Presence of carbonates
90 90 93

Humidity Plant Protection 93 Brightness temperature

94 95 Disinfection

95 95
calcium hydroxide Sodium hypochlorite Sodium hydroxide
95 95 96

Overseeding Hydroponic Green Forage Characteristics
97 103 Results
Dairy cows, calves
103 results, 104 results
Horses, results 106
Goats, Rabbits
107 results, 110 results
bovine Increased Fertility 112
Decreased Mastitis Incidence of Factor
112 anti-dehydration in horses
113 Production costs 116 FVH
Forage Production Costs According to conventional methodology

121 Replacement of feed 122 calves

Conclusions 123 Bibliography 125
Asked
Content 128 132
135 List of tables List of tables
137 Index figures
137

List of Tables

Table No. 1. Percentage composition of fattening cattle,

Peru 25 Table No. 2. Formula intensive fattening of cattle, used in the
Universidad La Molina, Peru 26
Table No 3. Food protein best known for
concentrated 26
Table No 4. Intensive cattle fattening diet
26 Table No. 5. Mineralized salt
15% 26 Table No. 6. Dairy cows diet of 30 Kl. Milk 26 Table No. 7
formulation for cattle fattening
27 Table 8. Several intensive fattening cattle diets
27 Table No. 9. Diet for calves from the first week 27
Table 10. Example of concentrate for laying hens
28 Table No. 11. Rations that can be used in fattening cattle
, Peru,% 28
Table No. 12. Composition of raw materials or mixtures
Table 29 Example No. 13 protein diet to raise pigs
30 Table No. 14. Water consumption for crop production
grass, conditions Field 41
Table No. 15. Comparative analysis of the nutritional value
grain oats and oat HGF, 10 cm. high and 13 days of growth
42 Table No. 16. Comparison between the characteristics of HGF
(barley) and other food sources
42 Table No. 17. FVH comparative costs
43 Table No. 18. HGF dose per 100 kg liveweight
61 Table No. 19. Ability to feed, 240 module trays
67 Table No. 20. HGF production by 74 m2
Table No. 21. Irrigation water quality in relation to the
shutter 79 Sprinkler
Table No. 22. Hydroponic minerals
83 Table No. 24. Avena biomass produced in hydroponic
four levels of nitrogen fertilization. Dry matter production
84 Table No. 25. Changes Protein (g/m2) in a culture of
FVH oats, in three crops and four levels of nitrogen fertilization
85 Table No. 26. Composition of a nutrient solution suitable for HGF
86 Table 27 Comparison of Green Fodder Production / year
ton / hectare
Table 97 Parameter No. 28 Nutritional Value
97 Table No. 29. Liveweight of calves 104
Table No. 3-30.Conversión food rations FVH
oat concentrate replacement
105 Table No. 31. Feed cost per kilo increase
bodyweight for 63 days of fattening
105 Table 32. Food Balance raise cattle, meat and milk
FVH
106 Table No. 33. Power Balance in Horses with HGF
107 Table No. 34. Average Daily Consumption of Crude Protein (CP) and digestible energy
(ED) in Sheep and Goats 108 Table No. 35. Liveweight (LW) in goats during the experimental period

109 Table No. 36 Feed conversion
goat as the treatment used
109 Table No. 37. Food Balance of goats
FVH 110 Table No. 38. Rabbit Food Balance with HGF
111 Table No. 39. Construction budget a unit of 70 m2

117 Table No. 40 Cash Flow
a House of 240 trays, 70 118 m2
Table No. 41. Budget for the Construction of a unit of 189 m2
HGF 1,350 kg / day, 960 trays
119 Table No. 42. Cash Flow for a House of 960
Trays, 189 m2 120
Table No. 43. Estimated Costs of Planting and Management of Forage
by Conventional Methods
121 Table No. 44. Type of agricultural machinery used in the production of forage
conventional techniques
122 Table No. 45 Equivalence of HGF with concentrate
123 Table No. 46. Economic effect of replacing the
FVH Oat concentrate on raising 123 calves

Index tables

Table No 1. Forage Unit Equivalency Table
37 No 2. Assimilation of HGF for 37 Kg
Table No 3. FVH Comparative grain in poultry feeding
44 Table No. 4. Planting density per tray / 50 seed
Table No 5. Major elements, parts per million (ppp) 58
Table No 6. Minor elements, parts per million (ppp) 59
Table No 7. Composition / Nutritional Analysis
62 Table No 8. Hydroponic fertilizer Commodity
92 Table No. 9 Seeding rate for Hydroponic Forage
Table 97 Composition No. 10 - 98 Nutritional Analysis HGF
Table No 11 Comparative
Hydroponic Green Forage Protein, Dry Matter, Digestibility, Energy 98
Table No 12. Hydroponic Sorghum Proximal analysis
99 Table No. 13. Chemical composition analysis of a barley plant
to 12 days, 99 hydroponic
Table No 14. Analysis of protein in a barley plant with different days
hydroponic planting
99 Table No. 15. Proximal Analysis of Corn 99 Hydroponic
Table No 16. Cultivar differences with and without ground feed 100
Table No 17. Differences between Dairy cows supplemented with HGF
(8kl/día) with 100 witnesses not
Table No 18. Chemical analysis comparing traditional barley and barley
hydroponic after 9 days of growth
100 Table No. 19. Feeding experiment
cows in production. nutrition and dry matter
101 Table No. 20. Comparative analysis of green fodder proximal
101 Table No. 21. Chemical composition analysis
proximal 102

ATTIC DELIGHTS - BREAKFAST SURPRISE IN CORDOBA

Monday, May 15, 2006

Implantation And Diarrhea

Melting And Annealing Calculations

Symptons Stomach Pangs Tired A Lot